CLM-COOP-001·hypothesis·open
Back to research agenda
Q-061M-005 · Cooperation, Organization & PowerT-010 · Cooperation Engineering & Conflict Transformationengineering
人类能否把合作从社会现象升级为可设计、可测试、可扩展的‘协作工程’？
This is a canonical research question in the X-LAB three-layer agenda. It connects upward to an era theme and millennium question, and downward to claims, evidence, experiments, systems, decisions and reality feedback.
Current evolution state
This state is deterministically derived from public / graph-safe authoritative projections. It is not a new source of truth or a scientific confidence score.
READINESS 0%
Research state
No evidence yetNo public Research OS evidence object linked yet.
Execution state
Not exportedMission Control has no public graph-safe mission projection for this question.
Decision state
Not exportedNo permission-safe YICE Decision has been exported for this question.
Reality state
Not exportedNo graph-safe YOUNION project, pilot, collaboration or outcome has been exported for this question.
Biggest current gap
No authoritative Research OS evidence object is publicly linked to this question yet.
Next critical move
Define or link the first evidence-bearing experiment or Research Package before making stronger claims.
Current claims & evidence
Claim status and confidence are provisional research judgments, not truth labels. Evidence may support, challenge or provide context.
Falsification-oriented experiment protocols
These are experiment designs, not results. Claim status can change only after preregistration, execution and a distinct result/evidence record.
EXP-COOP-CLAIM-001·CLM-COOP-001·proposed·preregistration required
Five-Lever Cooperation Mechanism Randomized Trial
在多人任务中随机改变激励兼容、可信承诺、贡献可观测性、冲突处理和退出机制的组合，对真人组、人机混合组和Agent组分别测试。
Primary metric
任务共同收益、合作持续率、冲突恢复时间与搭便车率
Supports
至少部分机制组合能跨主体类型显著提高共同收益和合作持续率，并降低冲突恢复成本。
Challenges
机制干预没有稳定改善，或提高效率的同时显著放大不公平、操纵或脆弱性。
Inconclusive
任务激励过于人工化、样本文化差异不足或参与者重复学习导致结果不可外推。
• 实验室合作不等于现实长期组织合作。
• 不同文化和权力结构可能改变机制效果。
Supported relationships
containsera_theme
Cooperation Engineering & Conflict Transformation
Era theme contains this canonical research question.
Exploreproposesclaim
Cooperation quality can be engineered through incentive compatibility, credible commitments, observable contribution, conflict resolution and exit mechanisms.
Research question proposes or tracks this explicit epistemic claim.
Exploretranslates toindustry_thesis
Energy Capital for Advanced Manufacturing
This research question informs a YOUNION industry thesis. The relation represents a translation hypothesis, not scientific validation or an investment recommendation.
Exploretranslates toindustry_thesis
Internationalization of Chinese Energy Technology and Capital
This research question informs a YOUNION industry thesis. The relation represents a translation hypothesis, not scientific validation or an investment recommendation.
ExploreCONTRIBUTE
Bring a resource that can move this question forward.
Experts, researchers, institutions, data, facilities, pilot environments and research funding can enter the ecosystem around this canonical ID.
Contribute to Q-061