X-LAB / RESEARCH AGENDA

Turn civilization-scale questions into research, experiments and usable capability.

X-LAB starts from long-horizon questions, narrows them into era themes, and then into canonical research questions that can accumulate hypotheses, experiments, prototypes and evidence.

Published research record

Published on Zenodo · DOI assignedE2 · Exploratory result

RES-LIFE-001 · BIORXIV/2026/753397

Public Data Reanalysis of Skeletal Muscle Ageing: Cross-Platform Age-Associated Candidates, Fibroblast GPCPD1 Association, and Limits of External Replication

Dong Wang · X-LAB · v0.5 · CC BY 4.0

A public-data reanalysis testing whether age-associated expression signals in human skeletal muscle persist across platforms and can be localized to specific cell types.

The analysis narrowed the evidence to an exploratory fibroblast–GPCPD1 association. External data were directionally consistent but not statistically significant, so this is not an independently replicated mechanism, biomarker or therapeutic target.

Independent cell-level replication and peer review not completed · Reproducibility package: partial

Published research

X LAB Human Evolution Research Agenda: From Ten Millennium Questions to Seventy-One Key Questions

Starlegend · · v1.1 · CC BY 4.0

10 millennium questions · 24 contemporary themes · 71 key questions · 5 flagship programs

Research agenda and methodological framework. This report does not present validated empirical findings and has not undergone independent peer review.

Cite this report

Starlegend. (2026). X LAB Human Evolution Research Agenda: From Ten Millennium Questions to Seventy-One Key Questions (Version 1.1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22741801

CURRENT RESEARCH PORTFOLIO

Canonical IDs remain unchanged

Keep the agenda stable. Re-rank execution as evidence and resources change.

The 10 millennium questions, 24 era themes and 71 canonical questions remain stable. This portfolio is the dynamic execution layer: priorities reflect strategic value, data readiness, replication conditions, AI execution fit and research-asset leverage.

Portfolio refreshed: 2026-09-22

Priority criteria

30%
Strategic value
25%
Data readiness
20%
Independent replication
15%
AI execution fit
10%
Research asset leverage

P0 · Execute now

Close active loops and launch research with strong data and validation paths.

4 tracks
ActiveHigh data readiness

Living systems and healthspan

Q-009Q-064Q-066Q-070

Next critical move

Close the RES-LIFE-001 reproducibility package and public-posting loop before opening the next data search.

ReadyHigh data readiness

Next-generation scientific discovery

Q-056

Next critical move

Require a documented topic-validation decision before a project charter, data scan and reproducibility package.

Data scanMedium data readiness

Human × AI cognitive coevolution

Q-002Q-004Q-007

Next critical move

Define measurable tasks and first-party data collection across Awake, YICE and Mirrorverse.

ReadyHigh data readiness

World-model failure and calibration

Q-046Q-060

Next critical move

Preregister failure signals, baselines and stop criteria across at least two task environments.

P1 · Scan then launch

Complete data, bias and measurement audits before formal project registration.

4 tracks
Data scanMedium data readiness

Cooperation engineering

Q-061

Next critical move

Audit Mirrorverse group-decision telemetry before starting a behavioral research package.

Data scanMedium data readiness

Agent organizations and minimum economic units

Q-012Q-013

Next critical move

Combine public cases with standardized X-LAB operating data and outcome measures.

Data scanHigh data readiness

Truth infrastructure and information immunity

Q-026Q-027

Next critical move

Run a dataset and bias audit across platforms, languages and content domains.

Data scanHigh data readiness

Civilizational resilience and early warning

Q-019Q-020Q-063

Next critical move

Select one bounded disaster or public-health setting with independent validation data.

P2 · Collaboration-led

Public-data pre-research is possible; stronger evidence requires external partners.

2 tracks
Partner requiredMedium data readiness

Synthetic biology and engineered living systems

Q-068Q-069Q-071

Next critical move

Use public data for pre-research while securing laboratory and industrial validation partners.

Partner requiredLow data readiness

Long-term effects of genome intervention

Q-067

Next critical move

Build the ethics, causality and longitudinal-data requirements before project launch.

P3 · Strategic reserve

Retain long-horizon importance without forcing premature empirical claims.

3 tracks
Long termLow data readiness

Cislunar and off-Earth civilization

Q-034Q-035Q-036Q-037Q-055

Next critical move

Maintain system models, scenario work and collaboration readiness as a strategic reserve.

Long termLow data readiness

Consciousness, identity and continuity

Q-041Q-042Q-043Q-044

Next critical move

Track measurement and theory advances; prioritize reviews and conceptual models.

Long termLow data readiness

Governance of human evolution

Q-052Q-053Q-054

Next critical move

Retain as a normative backbone connecting evidence from the active portfolio.

HUMAN EVOLUTION RESEARCH AGENDA

A three-layer agenda: millennium questions → era themes → research questions.

The old 55-question flat list is preserved at the ID level, but the research space is now organized by deeper questions and contemporary transition themes. New questions can be added without breaking the graph.

10
millennium questions
24
era themes
71
canonical research questions
Explore the full agenda

FLAGSHIP PROGRAMS

Focus the portfolio where X-LAB can compound evidence, systems and collaborators.

Programs are not peer products. They organize questions, experiments, systems and external collaboration around a coherent research mission.

PROGRAM-COEVOLUTION

Human × AI Cognitive Evolution

Study how human judgment, learning and action capacity can grow with AI instead of becoming the limiting factor.

Q-001Q-002Q-004Q-007
PROGRAM-CIVDEC

Civilization World Model & Decision Systems

Connect governance, shared reality, calibrated world models, simulation and robust decision-making into testable civilization infrastructure.

Q-024Q-026Q-046Q-047Q-057Q-060Q-063
PROGRAM-CISLUNAR

Cislunar Civilization Systems

Treat cislunar space as the first integrated testbed for transport, energy, resources, habitation, economics and governance beyond one planet.

Q-034Q-035Q-036Q-037Q-055
PROGRAM-SCIENCE-EVOLUTION

Next-Generation Scientific Discovery

Evolve the scientific method itself through AI co-scientists, executable knowledge, automated experimentation and continuous correction.

Q-056Q-057Q-060
PROGRAM-LIFE-SYSTEMS

Living Systems & Bioengineering

Study life across understanding, maintenance, genomic intervention, synthetic biology and civilizational applications. Questions define a research agenda, not validated outcomes.

Q-005Q-009Q-010Q-011Q-064Q-065Q-066Q-067Q-068Q-069Q-070Q-071

RESEARCH OS

A question becomes useful only when it can move through a traceable evidence chain.

The research workflow now begins above the individual question: millennium problem, era theme, research question, hypothesis or normative claim, evidence, experiment, replication and reality feedback.

EVO-Ruler: connect future research with action today

Track technology, market and capital separately, with evidence, milestones and real-world feedback. A method under calibration; initial cases have no completed field validation. Article in Chinese.

Explore the method and initial cases →
01
Millennium Question
02
Era Theme
03
Research Question
04
Topic Validation
05
Hypothesis / Normative Claim
06
External Evidence
07
Preregistration
08
Experiment / Prototype
09
Runs / Results
10
Analysis / Replication
11
EQS + Evidence Level
12
Insight
13
Research Package
14
Public Release / Expert Review
15
YICE / Reality

RESEARCH PACKAGES

Publish the evidence chain, not just the conclusion.

Research Packages bind canonical question IDs to evidence, experiments, code, limitations, quality scoring, expert review and downstream decision use.

Public package feed: integration in progress

JOIN THE RESEARCH

Bring expertise, data, facilities, pilot environments or research funding.

The Ecosystem Layer connects real people and institutions to specific questions, themes, programs and resource gaps.

Work with X-LAB

How does digital business practice inform research?

Our account operations, courses, advisory and pilots provide real questions and observations. Methods are revised in practice and return to content, teaching and tools. Application observations and formal research findings are recorded separately.

  • Which tasks can be reliably delegated to AI with real inputs?
  • Where do humans need to judge, review or take over?
  • Does faster work also improve quality, cost and customer outcomes?

Record goals and baseline, method version, human–AI roles, actions, outcomes and exceptions. Aggregate authorized feedback to revise knowledge cards, courses and service workflows.

Formal research needs a separate measurement, comparison and participation plan. Keep failures and null improvements; do not treat learner reports or before–after changes as causal findings.